<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business Cards and the Mulley Communications business philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mulley.ie/blog/2008/12/business-cards-and-the-mulley-communications-business-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mulley.ie/blog/2008/12/business-cards-and-the-mulley-communications-business-philosophy/</link>
	<description>Communications including Online PR and Online Marketing training courses, mentoring, consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:58:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Brunkard</title>
		<link>http://mulley.ie/blog/2008/12/business-cards-and-the-mulley-communications-business-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Brunkard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mulley.ie/?p=52#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Damien, at the risk of attracting your ire towards my own online activities I think this is a bad idea. 

Your writing style on your blog is certainly refreshing and I am consistently delighted that we share plenty of view points regarding the fate of the communications business in Ireland, particularly as it spirals towards self anihilation through neglecting new media.   I think your card and the &#039;cross pollination&#039; of language and approach between your regular blog and your professional blog is a bad move.

One sure way of causing information fatigue in opinion leaders/customers/blog readers is to be overtly sensational constantly.  

When Bob Geldof swore for the first time (for him?)on TV in 1985  it was a  historic expression of frustration at the inaction of the international community in the face of  a devastating famine in Ethiopia.   After two decades of Bob Geldof F-ing and blinding the powers that be, he has lost the ability to give impact to any subsequent argument he might to highlight.

If everything is &#039;fucking important&#039; then nothing appears &#039;extra fucking important&#039; when required.  If some things are expressed as &#039;important&#039; and other things are &#039;fucking important&#039; then you regain that power to highlight with an expletive.

Using hysterical language constantly risks diminishing your arguments as time passes and you pick up new audiences.  I suspect there are generation of people who need to know this stuff that might better relate to more formal language.  

P.s.  I&#039;m not a prude.  I&#039;m just worried for you.  I care etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damien, at the risk of attracting your ire towards my own online activities I think this is a bad idea. </p>
<p>Your writing style on your blog is certainly refreshing and I am consistently delighted that we share plenty of view points regarding the fate of the communications business in Ireland, particularly as it spirals towards self anihilation through neglecting new media.   I think your card and the &#8216;cross pollination&#8217; of language and approach between your regular blog and your professional blog is a bad move.</p>
<p>One sure way of causing information fatigue in opinion leaders/customers/blog readers is to be overtly sensational constantly.  </p>
<p>When Bob Geldof swore for the first time (for him?)on TV in 1985  it was a  historic expression of frustration at the inaction of the international community in the face of  a devastating famine in Ethiopia.   After two decades of Bob Geldof F-ing and blinding the powers that be, he has lost the ability to give impact to any subsequent argument he might to highlight.</p>
<p>If everything is &#8216;fucking important&#8217; then nothing appears &#8216;extra fucking important&#8217; when required.  If some things are expressed as &#8216;important&#8217; and other things are &#8216;fucking important&#8217; then you regain that power to highlight with an expletive.</p>
<p>Using hysterical language constantly risks diminishing your arguments as time passes and you pick up new audiences.  I suspect there are generation of people who need to know this stuff that might better relate to more formal language.  </p>
<p>P.s.  I&#8217;m not a prude.  I&#8217;m just worried for you.  I care etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley</title>
		<link>http://mulley.ie/blog/2008/12/business-cards-and-the-mulley-communications-business-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mulley.ie/?p=52#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Not quite :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite <img src='http://mulley.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://mulley.ie/blog/2008/12/business-cards-and-the-mulley-communications-business-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mulley.ie/?p=52#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Was that designed specially for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was that designed specially for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://mulley.ie/blog/2008/12/business-cards-and-the-mulley-communications-business-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mulley.ie/?p=52#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Will the other side of the card still say &quot;Professional ****stirrer&quot; like the other card?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the other side of the card still say &#8220;Professional ****stirrer&#8221; like the other card?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
